<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 695 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that no Central Excise duty could be imposed on the damaged molasses following an accident. The rejection of the remission application was found unjustified due to lack of proper verification and legal basis. The appellant&#039;s claim for remission was upheld, emphasizing the necessity of thorough verification processes and valid reasons for rejecting remission applications in similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:08:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 695 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, ruling that no Central Excise duty could be imposed on the damaged molasses following an accident. The rejection of the remission application was found unjustified due to lack of proper verification and legal basis. The appellant&#039;s claim for remission was upheld, emphasizing the necessity of thorough verification processes and valid reasons for rejecting remission applications in similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>