<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 690 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the quantity discount offered by M/s. Biochem Pharmaceuticals Inds. Ltd. to distributors/stockists in institutional supply contracts was akin to a commission and should be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of clear contractual terms and full disclosure of relevant details during legal proceedings. The decision underscored the distinction between quantity discounts and commissions in such contracts, ultimately ruling against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 690 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the quantity discount offered by M/s. Biochem Pharmaceuticals Inds. Ltd. to distributors/stockists in institutional supply contracts was akin to a commission and should be included in the assessable value. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of clear contractual terms and full disclosure of relevant details during legal proceedings. The decision underscored the distinction between quantity discounts and commissions in such contracts, ultimately ruling against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>