<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 687 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346629</link>
    <description>Cement cleared in 50 kg bags to buyers using it for ready-mix concrete manufacture and construction work was treated as supply to industrial or institutional consumers. Because Rule 2A of the Packaged Commodities Rules excluded Chapter II for such direct purchases from manufacturers, retail sale price declaration was not required, and the goods were eligible for concessional treatment under Notification No. 4/2006 as if cleared in other than packaged form. The duty demand and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 687 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346629</link>
      <description>Cement cleared in 50 kg bags to buyers using it for ready-mix concrete manufacture and construction work was treated as supply to industrial or institutional consumers. Because Rule 2A of the Packaged Commodities Rules excluded Chapter II for such direct purchases from manufacturers, retail sale price declaration was not required, and the goods were eligible for concessional treatment under Notification No. 4/2006 as if cleared in other than packaged form. The duty demand and penalty were therefore not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>