<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 686 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346628</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a Writ of Mandamus seeking to waive rent/demurrage charges for detained goods. The court clarified that custodians must comply with the directive of not charging rent or demurrage on detained goods as per Regulation 6(1)(l) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulation, 2009. The court held that the Writ Petitions were maintainable, directing the custodians to waive charges in accordance with the Department&#039;s directive within a specified time frame. M/s.Calyx Container Terminals and M/s.K.Steamship Agencies were instructed to comply with the court&#039;s directions without costs to the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 686 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346628</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner in a Writ of Mandamus seeking to waive rent/demurrage charges for detained goods. The court clarified that custodians must comply with the directive of not charging rent or demurrage on detained goods as per Regulation 6(1)(l) of the Handling of Cargo in Customs Area Regulation, 2009. The court held that the Writ Petitions were maintainable, directing the custodians to waive charges in accordance with the Department&#039;s directive within a specified time frame. M/s.Calyx Container Terminals and M/s.K.Steamship Agencies were instructed to comply with the court&#039;s directions without costs to the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>