https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346623 The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions both for delay and on merits. The order records that the delay in seeking review was not condoned, which by itself justified dismissal. It further records that, independently of delay, the review petitions failed on merits because the grounds raised did not warrant interference with the earlier judgment. The signed order therefore reflects dismissal on both procedural and substantive grounds. en-us Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:05:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346623 The Supreme Court dismissed the review petitions both for delay and on merits. The order records that the delay in seeking review was not condoned, which by itself justified dismissal. It further records that, independently of delay, the review petitions failed on merits because the grounds raised did not warrant interference with the earlier judgment. The signed order therefore reflects dismissal on both procedural and substantive grounds. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346623