<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 678 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346620</link>
    <description>The High Court rejected the promissory estoppel challenge to a notification restricting refund of CST paid by SSI units but found the restriction lacked nexus with the intended objective. Judicial review of the policy decision emphasized limiting interference to arbitrariness and unreasonableness. The Court upheld the State&#039;s power to modify economic policies for public interest, allowing the appeals with directions to not reopen granted claims and affirming the State&#039;s authority to modify policies for valid reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 678 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346620</link>
      <description>The High Court rejected the promissory estoppel challenge to a notification restricting refund of CST paid by SSI units but found the restriction lacked nexus with the intended objective. Judicial review of the policy decision emphasized limiting interference to arbitrariness and unreasonableness. The Court upheld the State&#039;s power to modify economic policies for public interest, allowing the appeals with directions to not reopen granted claims and affirming the State&#039;s authority to modify policies for valid reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>