<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 670 - ATPMLA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal declared the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s provisional attachment of properties already in custody of the Central Bureau of Investigation as illegal and lacking immediate necessity. It emphasized the importance of following proper legal procedures under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and obtaining court permission before attaching properties in court custody. The confirmation of the provisional attachment orders was deemed invalid due to insufficient evidence and lack of independent investigation. The Enforcement Directorate was directed to repay the proceeds to the court&#039;s account, and all appeals and pending applications were disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 670 - ATPMLA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal declared the Enforcement Directorate&#039;s provisional attachment of properties already in custody of the Central Bureau of Investigation as illegal and lacking immediate necessity. It emphasized the importance of following proper legal procedures under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, and obtaining court permission before attaching properties in court custody. The confirmation of the provisional attachment orders was deemed invalid due to insufficient evidence and lack of independent investigation. The Enforcement Directorate was directed to repay the proceeds to the court&#039;s account, and all appeals and pending applications were disposed of with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>