<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1251 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the requirement of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the appellants to make individual pre-deposits for separate appeals within one month. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s argument for waiver based on previous judgments under un-amended provisions, emphasizing the current mandate for pre-deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1251 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the requirement of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, directing the appellants to make individual pre-deposits for separate appeals within one month. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s argument for waiver based on previous judgments under un-amended provisions, emphasizing the current mandate for pre-deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>