https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193822 The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking rectification of errors in its order, stating that the alleged errors were not apparent but required a re-evaluation of facts and detailed arguments beyond the scope of rectification. Emphasizing that rectification should address obvious mistakes, not debatable points, the Tribunal rejected the application as an impermissible attempt to re-hear the appeal. The decision was made on 19-7-2016, concluding the legal proceedings. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 07:56:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193822 The Tribunal dismissed the miscellaneous application seeking rectification of errors in its order, stating that the alleged errors were not apparent but required a re-evaluation of facts and detailed arguments beyond the scope of rectification. Emphasizing that rectification should address obvious mistakes, not debatable points, the Tribunal rejected the application as an impermissible attempt to re-hear the appeal. The decision was made on 19-7-2016, concluding the legal proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193822