<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1338 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193823</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit despite a procedural violation in failing to pay duty on time. The demand for duty along with interest was deemed unsustainable as the appellant eventually paid the overdue duty with interest. A reduced penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant was granted relief, rectifying the delayed duty payment and being permitted to avail Cenvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 07:56:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1338 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193823</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail Cenvat credit despite a procedural violation in failing to pay duty on time. The demand for duty along with interest was deemed unsustainable as the appellant eventually paid the overdue duty with interest. A reduced penalty of Rs. 5,000 was imposed under Rule 27 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The appellant was granted relief, rectifying the delayed duty payment and being permitted to avail Cenvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>