https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193820 Under Section 3 of the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979, the Managing Director's determination of the sum due and issuance of a recovery certificate had serious civil consequences and was made final by the statute. The provision was therefore read as requiring compliance with natural justice, even though no express hearing requirement was stated. The words "determine" and "sum due" implied that the alleged defaulter had to be given an opportunity to be heard before liability was finally fixed and recovery proceedings were triggered. The determination and consequential recovery certificate were held vitiated for non-compliance with natural justice. en-us Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Aug 2017 18:39:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193820 Under Section 3 of the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979, the Managing Director's determination of the sum due and issuance of a recovery certificate had serious civil consequences and was made final by the statute. The provision was therefore read as requiring compliance with natural justice, even though no express hearing requirement was stated. The words "determine" and "sum due" implied that the alleged defaulter had to be given an opportunity to be heard before liability was finally fixed and recovery proceedings were triggered. The determination and consequential recovery certificate were held vitiated for non-compliance with natural justice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193820