<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (9) TMI 33 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193816</link>
    <description>A decree passed in a properly constituted representative suit binds the represented class as res judicata under Order 1 Rule 8 and Section 11 Explanation VI, but it cannot be personally executed against persons who were not eo nomine parties to the suit; enforcement under Section 47 is confined to parties or their representatives, so non-parties cannot be proceeded against for disobedience of the injunction. A representative suit is nevertheless maintainable for recovery of damages where the claim is founded on a common interest shared by the represented body, because the nature of relief does not by itself exclude Order 1 Rule 8 if the common-interest requirement and notice procedure are satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 16:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (9) TMI 33 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193816</link>
      <description>A decree passed in a properly constituted representative suit binds the represented class as res judicata under Order 1 Rule 8 and Section 11 Explanation VI, but it cannot be personally executed against persons who were not eo nomine parties to the suit; enforcement under Section 47 is confined to parties or their representatives, so non-parties cannot be proceeded against for disobedience of the injunction. A representative suit is nevertheless maintainable for recovery of damages where the claim is founded on a common interest shared by the represented body, because the nature of relief does not by itself exclude Order 1 Rule 8 if the common-interest requirement and notice procedure are satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>