<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 609 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193813</link>
    <description>The court declared the removal of the petitioner as director illegal and set aside the appointment of the third respondent and another as directors. It nullified the transfer of shares and allotment of additional shares, ordering the second respondent to sell his shares to the petitioner. The court aimed to ensure the company&#039;s smooth functioning due to irreconcilable differences. The company petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 609 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193813</link>
      <description>The court declared the removal of the petitioner as director illegal and set aside the appointment of the third respondent and another as directors. It nullified the transfer of shares and allotment of additional shares, ordering the second respondent to sell his shares to the petitioner. The court aimed to ensure the company&#039;s smooth functioning due to irreconcilable differences. The company petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>