<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 64 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9572</link>
    <description>The court held that compensation received by employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme qualifies as &quot;termination of employment&quot; under section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, making them eligible for relief under section 89(1). The court ruled that employees can claim both exemptions under section 10(10C)(viii) and relief under section 89(1). The Central Board of Direct Taxes&#039; directive denying relief was overturned, allowing employees to benefit from both provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 64 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9572</link>
      <description>The court held that compensation received by employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme qualifies as &quot;termination of employment&quot; under section 17(3) of the Income-tax Act, making them eligible for relief under section 89(1). The court ruled that employees can claim both exemptions under section 10(10C)(viii) and relief under section 89(1). The Central Board of Direct Taxes&#039; directive denying relief was overturned, allowing employees to benefit from both provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>