<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193802</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere on the facts of the case, dismissing the special leave petition. The Court expressly kept the question of law open, so no substantive legal conclusion was recorded on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 11:48:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485939" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 676 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193802</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere on the facts of the case, dismissing the special leave petition. The Court expressly kept the question of law open, so no substantive legal conclusion was recorded on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>