<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346608</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Income Tax Settlement Commission&#039;s order and directed them to proceed with the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 245D (1) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s offer to withdraw certain claims and disclose income before the ITSC satisfied the requirement of disclosing income not previously declared before the Assessing Officer. The Court emphasized that demonstrating a fresh source of income was not mandatory, contrary to the ITSC&#039;s decision. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner, with the ITSC instructed to reconsider the application based on the Court&#039;s interpretation of disclosure requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346608</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Income Tax Settlement Commission&#039;s order and directed them to proceed with the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 245D (1) of the Income Tax Act. The Court held that the petitioner&#039;s offer to withdraw certain claims and disclose income before the ITSC satisfied the requirement of disclosing income not previously declared before the Assessing Officer. The Court emphasized that demonstrating a fresh source of income was not mandatory, contrary to the ITSC&#039;s decision. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the petitioner, with the ITSC instructed to reconsider the application based on the Court&#039;s interpretation of disclosure requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>