<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 664 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346606</link>
    <description>Special leave against an acquittal under Section 181 IPC is to be granted only where the challenged order is shown to be unreasonable, perverse, or affected by legal infirmity. On the facts, the prosecution failed because the alleged false statement was not proved in the manner required, the oath-related procedure was not properly followed, the sanction for prosecution was not duly established, and the record did not show deliberate falsehood or mens rea. The acceptance of the assessee&#039;s explanation in parallel proceedings also supported the view that the complaint was unsustainable. Special leave to appeal was therefore rightly refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 664 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346606</link>
      <description>Special leave against an acquittal under Section 181 IPC is to be granted only where the challenged order is shown to be unreasonable, perverse, or affected by legal infirmity. On the facts, the prosecution failed because the alleged false statement was not proved in the manner required, the oath-related procedure was not properly followed, the sanction for prosecution was not duly established, and the record did not show deliberate falsehood or mens rea. The acceptance of the assessee&#039;s explanation in parallel proceedings also supported the view that the complaint was unsustainable. Special leave to appeal was therefore rightly refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>