<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346586</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notices under Section 147 for the Assessment Years 2000-2001 and 2001-2002, along with the consequent Assessment Orders, citing that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion and lacked valid reasons. The petitioners were deemed entitled to deductions under Section 10B as their activities qualified as &quot;production.&quot; The court rejected the argument for an alternate remedy, allowing the challenges within the current proceedings. The orders were set aside, and both petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 644 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346586</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notices under Section 147 for the Assessment Years 2000-2001 and 2001-2002, along with the consequent Assessment Orders, citing that the reassessment was based on a change of opinion and lacked valid reasons. The petitioners were deemed entitled to deductions under Section 10B as their activities qualified as &quot;production.&quot; The court rejected the argument for an alternate remedy, allowing the challenges within the current proceedings. The orders were set aside, and both petitions were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>