<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 643 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346585</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to re-examine the issue of bogus purchases from hawala parties. The assessee was given the opportunity to prove the genuineness and utilization of the purchases in its business, with the AO instructed to follow principles of natural justice during reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 643 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346585</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and directing the AO to re-examine the issue of bogus purchases from hawala parties. The assessee was given the opportunity to prove the genuineness and utilization of the purchases in its business, with the AO instructed to follow principles of natural justice during reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>