https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346580 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the extended period and the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal filed by the construction service provider was dismissed, sustaining the penalties imposed for failure to pay Service Tax under the Goods Transport Agency category, indicating willful suppression. The judgment was pronounced on 11.08.2017 by Mr. Devender Singh, Member (Technical) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346580 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the extended period and the imposition of penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal filed by the construction service provider was dismissed, sustaining the penalties imposed for failure to pay Service Tax under the Goods Transport Agency category, indicating willful suppression. The judgment was pronounced on 11.08.2017 by Mr. Devender Singh, Member (Technical) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chandigarh. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346580