https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346573 The court disposed of the case, allowing the petitioner to address concerns through the appeal process as the main prayers in the writ petition became moot following the adjudication order issued by the Department, which rejected the declared assessable value of the seized goods and reassessed customs duty liability, including interest and penalties. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to raise all relevant grounds, including the legality of the seizure, in an appeal against the adjudication order. en-us Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:19:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346573 The court disposed of the case, allowing the petitioner to address concerns through the appeal process as the main prayers in the writ petition became moot following the adjudication order issued by the Department, which rejected the declared assessable value of the seized goods and reassessed customs duty liability, including interest and penalties. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to raise all relevant grounds, including the legality of the seizure, in an appeal against the adjudication order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346573