https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346569 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2015-16 due to lack of jurisdiction of AVATO Ward-72. The court directed the Respondent to issue fresh notices through the correct jurisdictional VATO within four weeks. The court emphasized that the decision did not address the merits of the substantive issues raised by the Petitioner. en-us Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346569 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned orders for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2015-16 due to lack of jurisdiction of AVATO Ward-72. The court directed the Respondent to issue fresh notices through the correct jurisdictional VATO within four weeks. The court emphasized that the decision did not address the merits of the substantive issues raised by the Petitioner. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 10 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346569