<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9565</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. Firstly, it allowed the deduction for a contingent liability in the computation of business income. Secondly, it held that the investment in a particular entity qualified as an eligible business under section 32AB, including the dividend income earned from this investment in computing profits. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 52 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9565</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. Firstly, it allowed the deduction for a contingent liability in the computation of business income. Secondly, it held that the investment in a particular entity qualified as an eligible business under section 32AB, including the dividend income earned from this investment in computing profits. The appeal was allowed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>