https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193799 The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the petition and proceeded with the matter. It issued notice and directed that the petition be tagged with SLP(C) No. 26530 of 2016 because a related question of law was already under consideration in that proceeding. The Court declined to grant interim relief to the petitioner and refused, at this stage, to stay the High Court's directions requiring action against a Union of India officer. It also called upon the Union to indicate what action it proposed to take and listed the matter after a week for further hearing. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:13:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193799 The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the petition and proceeded with the matter. It issued notice and directed that the petition be tagged with SLP(C) No. 26530 of 2016 because a related question of law was already under consideration in that proceeding. The Court declined to grant interim relief to the petitioner and refused, at this stage, to stay the High Court's directions requiring action against a Union of India officer. It also called upon the Union to indicate what action it proposed to take and listed the matter after a week for further hearing. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193799