<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 621 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346563</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee and against the applicant-revenue on all three issues presented: deletion of interest-free loan, deduction of royalty on Bamboo exploited, and deletion of contribution made to educational institutions. The Court found that previous judgments had already addressed and settled these matters, leading to the decision in favor of the respondent-assessee based on established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 621 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346563</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee and against the applicant-revenue on all three issues presented: deletion of interest-free loan, deduction of royalty on Bamboo exploited, and deletion of contribution made to educational institutions. The Court found that previous judgments had already addressed and settled these matters, leading to the decision in favor of the respondent-assessee based on established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>