<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1345 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193782</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the addition of income under section 56(2)(vii)(b). The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the invalid initiation of penalty proceedings and lack of evidence to show an intention to evade tax. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear findings and valid initiation of penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1345 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193782</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the addition of income under section 56(2)(vii)(b). The Tribunal allowed the appeal, citing the invalid initiation of penalty proceedings and lack of evidence to show an intention to evade tax. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of clear findings and valid initiation of penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>