<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1242 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications for recall/modification of the order dated 04.08.2010, setting aside the impugned order and dismissing O.A. No. 1084 of 2010. A heavy cost of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the applicant for misleading facts. The Tribunal found the challenge unjustified, noting the matter of seniority was sub judice and the applicant was not within the promotion consideration zone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 18:47:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1242 - CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the applications for recall/modification of the order dated 04.08.2010, setting aside the impugned order and dismissing O.A. No. 1084 of 2010. A heavy cost of Rs. 10,000 was imposed on the applicant for misleading facts. The Tribunal found the challenge unjustified, noting the matter of seniority was sub judice and the applicant was not within the promotion consideration zone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>