<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 618 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193768</link>
    <description>Additional depreciation on windmills, the scope of revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263, and the permissibility of the Assessing Officer&#039;s view were identified as substantial questions of law. The appeals were admitted, directed to be listed for final hearing on 09.07.2012, and the appellant was required to serve fresh notice on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 618 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193768</link>
      <description>Additional depreciation on windmills, the scope of revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263, and the permissibility of the Assessing Officer&#039;s view were identified as substantial questions of law. The appeals were admitted, directed to be listed for final hearing on 09.07.2012, and the appellant was required to serve fresh notice on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>