<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 62 -  UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9558</link>
    <description>Section 24AA of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 permitted surtax exemption only for the class of foreign companies expressly covered by the notification, namely those engaged by association or participation in mineral oil operations. A foreign contractor under a service contract was held outside that limited class because the agreement was for services, not participation in prospecting, extraction, or production of mineral oils, and the claimed exemption was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 62 -  UTTARANCHAL High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9558</link>
      <description>Section 24AA of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 permitted surtax exemption only for the class of foreign companies expressly covered by the notification, namely those engaged by association or participation in mineral oil operations. A foreign contractor under a service contract was held outside that limited class because the agreement was for services, not participation in prospecting, extraction, or production of mineral oils, and the claimed exemption was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>