<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1142 - COMPANY LAW BOARD KOLKATA BENCH,</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193755</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the company is a family company originating from a joint family business, ruling in favor of R-2&#039;s actions as not detrimental. R-2&#039;s partition suit for the property was deemed valid, and his letter to the Directorate of Drugs Control was not oppressive. Allegations of undercutting were dismissed, the EGM held by respondents was invalid, and R-2&#039;s removal as director was unjustified. The court ordered the division of company assets, allocating units to respective groups and appointing a valuer for fair compensation, emphasizing the importance of family dynamics and equitable resolution of disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 12:44:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1142 - COMPANY LAW BOARD KOLKATA BENCH,</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193755</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the company is a family company originating from a joint family business, ruling in favor of R-2&#039;s actions as not detrimental. R-2&#039;s partition suit for the property was deemed valid, and his letter to the Directorate of Drugs Control was not oppressive. Allegations of undercutting were dismissed, the EGM held by respondents was invalid, and R-2&#039;s removal as director was unjustified. The court ordered the division of company assets, allocating units to respective groups and appointing a valuer for fair compensation, emphasizing the importance of family dynamics and equitable resolution of disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>