https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346555 The court found the respondent department's failure to revise the seniority list of Income Tax Officers (ITOs) as per the Supreme Court's decision in N.R. Parmar case to be in violation of the petitioners' legitimate expectations for promotion. The court directed the department to finalize the revised seniority list within eight weeks, restrain ad hoc promotions using the old list, and consider the petitioners for promotion promptly after finalizing the revised list. The court emphasized compliance with the directives within the specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 16:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346555 The court found the respondent department's failure to revise the seniority list of Income Tax Officers (ITOs) as per the Supreme Court's decision in N.R. Parmar case to be in violation of the petitioners' legitimate expectations for promotion. The court directed the department to finalize the revised seniority list within eight weeks, restrain ad hoc promotions using the old list, and consider the petitioners for promotion promptly after finalizing the revised list. The court emphasized compliance with the directives within the specified timeframe. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346555