<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 66 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9552</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court found that the high denomination notes found in possession of the assessee were valueless and did not constitute unexplained money. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 66 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9552</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Court found that the high denomination notes found in possession of the assessee were valueless and did not constitute unexplained money. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>