<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 606 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to estimate the net profit at 5% on total purchases net of all deductions in the liquor trade business for AY 2011-12. The addition of unexplained investment was upheld due to lack of satisfactory explanation, while the addition towards other income was set aside as part of the estimated business income. The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:41:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 606 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to estimate the net profit at 5% on total purchases net of all deductions in the liquor trade business for AY 2011-12. The addition of unexplained investment was upheld due to lack of satisfactory explanation, while the addition towards other income was set aside as part of the estimated business income. The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>