<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 605 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346547</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal concerning the estimation of profit in the IMFL business, reducing the profit margin to 5% of the purchase price. However, the grounds related to unexplained expenditure and interest income were dismissed as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The decision was based on the evidence presented and the application of relevant legal principles in each issue discussed during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 605 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346547</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal concerning the estimation of profit in the IMFL business, reducing the profit margin to 5% of the purchase price. However, the grounds related to unexplained expenditure and interest income were dismissed as the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The decision was based on the evidence presented and the application of relevant legal principles in each issue discussed during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>