<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 597 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346539</link>
    <description>Section 73 was applied only to persons liable to file returns under Section 70 during the relevant period, so proceedings against a service recipient were not maintainable where no return-filing obligation existed at that time. The later introduction of Section 71A created that obligation prospectively and did not retrospectively validate earlier show cause notices or demands. On that basis, the demand of service tax and interest was treated as unsustainable and the order confirming it was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:38:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 597 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346539</link>
      <description>Section 73 was applied only to persons liable to file returns under Section 70 during the relevant period, so proceedings against a service recipient were not maintainable where no return-filing obligation existed at that time. The later introduction of Section 71A created that obligation prospectively and did not retrospectively validate earlier show cause notices or demands. On that basis, the demand of service tax and interest was treated as unsustainable and the order confirming it was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>