https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346537 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act,1944. The Court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate specific grounds for arbitrariness or violation of natural justice to warrant waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F. The Court found the deposit amount of 7.5% reasonable and rejected the argument of financial difficulty as an exceptional circumstance. No relief was granted to the petitioners, and no costs were imposed. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:38:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346537 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order by the Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act,1944. The Court held that the petitioners failed to demonstrate specific grounds for arbitrariness or violation of natural justice to warrant waiver of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F. The Court found the deposit amount of 7.5% reasonable and rejected the argument of financial difficulty as an exceptional circumstance. No relief was granted to the petitioners, and no costs were imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346537