<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 586 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee regarding liability to pay interest on excise duty demand. The appeal abated due to the death of the proprietor, as per legal provisions. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the interpretation of legal provisions regarding interest demand, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 586 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) in favor of the assessee regarding liability to pay interest on excise duty demand. The appeal abated due to the death of the proprietor, as per legal provisions. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision on the interpretation of legal provisions regarding interest demand, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>