<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 583 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346525</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and granted consequential benefits to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and the requirement to follow due process, including the examination of witnesses, as per Section 9(D) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 583 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346525</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order, and granted consequential benefits to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and the requirement to follow due process, including the examination of witnesses, as per Section 9(D) of the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>