<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346523</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ruling that the issue of determining the applicable rate of duty did not fall within the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. The CESTAT&#039;s decision granting the assessee the concessional rate of 1% duty under Notification 12/2012 was upheld, supported by relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346523</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ruling that the issue of determining the applicable rate of duty did not fall within the High Court&#039;s jurisdiction. The CESTAT&#039;s decision granting the assessee the concessional rate of 1% duty under Notification 12/2012 was upheld, supported by relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>