<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 24 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9549</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking benefits under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, due to a delay in payment, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines. Despite acknowledging the delay as a harsh case, the court held that without provisions for condonation of delay, it couldn&#039;t intervene in favor of the petitioners. The court highlighted the absence of provisions for condoning delays in the Act, leading to the dismissal of the petition and emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 24 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9549</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking benefits under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, due to a delay in payment, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory timelines. Despite acknowledging the delay as a harsh case, the court held that without provisions for condonation of delay, it couldn&#039;t intervene in favor of the petitioners. The court highlighted the absence of provisions for condoning delays in the Act, leading to the dismissal of the petition and emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9549</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>