https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346515 The High Court acquitted the petitioner of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found that the petitioner successfully rebutted the presumption of an existing debt by highlighting inconsistencies in the evidence and lack of documentary support for the respondent's claim. The court set aside the convictions from the Trial Court and Appellate Court, ordering the return of any deposited amounts by the petitioner and allowing the respondent the opportunity to challenge the decision in a superior court. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:35:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346515 The High Court acquitted the petitioner of the charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court found that the petitioner successfully rebutted the presumption of an existing debt by highlighting inconsistencies in the evidence and lack of documentary support for the respondent's claim. The court set aside the convictions from the Trial Court and Appellate Court, ordering the return of any deposited amounts by the petitioner and allowing the respondent the opportunity to challenge the decision in a superior court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346515