<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1401 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193746</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the order of suspension of trading in securities, citing the need for interim measures to protect investors pending further investigation into market manipulation. It upheld the authority of the Managing Director to pass the order, emphasizing the specialized nature of stock market operations. The court declined to entertain challenges to the order based on staleness of facts, violation of natural justice principles, and the validity of Regulation 21, highlighting the availability of alternative statutory remedies under SEBI regulations. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1401 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193746</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging the order of suspension of trading in securities, citing the need for interim measures to protect investors pending further investigation into market manipulation. It upheld the authority of the Managing Director to pass the order, emphasizing the specialized nature of stock market operations. The court declined to entertain challenges to the order based on staleness of facts, violation of natural justice principles, and the validity of Regulation 21, highlighting the availability of alternative statutory remedies under SEBI regulations. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193746</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>