<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1568 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193747</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation regarding property ownership and tax exemption misuse within eight weeks and pass suitable orders in accordance with the law. The court did not delve into the merits of the case but focused on providing a specific direction for the disposal of the representation. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1568 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193747</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner&#039;s representation regarding property ownership and tax exemption misuse within eight weeks and pass suitable orders in accordance with the law. The court did not delve into the merits of the case but focused on providing a specific direction for the disposal of the representation. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>