<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1382 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193749</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned order, and restored the VAT Appeals to the Tribunal for a fresh decision. The Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the rival contentions and left all arguments open for reconsideration by the Tribunal. The decision emphasized that the Tribunal should decide the Appeals in accordance with the law, without being influenced by its previous tentative conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:35:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1382 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193749</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petitions, quashed the impugned order, and restored the VAT Appeals to the Tribunal for a fresh decision. The Court clarified that it had not expressed any opinion on the rival contentions and left all arguments open for reconsideration by the Tribunal. The decision emphasized that the Tribunal should decide the Appeals in accordance with the law, without being influenced by its previous tentative conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>