<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1417 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193751</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, rejected a Creditor Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to the operational creditor&#039;s failure to submit a certificate from the Financial Institution confirming non-payment of the operational debt by the Corporate Debtor, as required by Section 9(3)(c) of the Code. Despite being given an opportunity, the creditor did not provide the necessary certificate, citing difficulties in obtaining it from an overseas bank. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of this requirement, leading to the rejection of the petition for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1417 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193751</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, rejected a Creditor Petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code due to the operational creditor&#039;s failure to submit a certificate from the Financial Institution confirming non-payment of the operational debt by the Corporate Debtor, as required by Section 9(3)(c) of the Code. Despite being given an opportunity, the creditor did not provide the necessary certificate, citing difficulties in obtaining it from an overseas bank. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of this requirement, leading to the rejection of the petition for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>