https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193742 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 56,50,000 as undisclosed income based on significant evidence from search and seizure operations. However, the additions of Rs. 8,13,010 as unexplained investment and Rs. 1,16,400 as income from other sources were deleted. The Tribunal stressed the credibility of evidence and consistency in declaring agricultural income. en-us Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:35:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193742 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the addition of Rs. 56,50,000 as undisclosed income based on significant evidence from search and seizure operations. However, the additions of Rs. 8,13,010 as unexplained investment and Rs. 1,16,400 as income from other sources were deleted. The Tribunal stressed the credibility of evidence and consistency in declaring agricultural income. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193742