<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 570 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346512</link>
    <description>The Court allowed exemptions for delay in filing applications in ITA No. 504/2017. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against ITAT&#039;s order for AY 2007-08 in ITA No.733 and 788/Del/2013 was addressed. The dispute centered on classifying income from properties as business income or income from house property. The Assessee historically treated the income as &#039;income from house property,&#039; but the AO changed the classification. The ITAT upheld the historical treatment for two properties and remanded the third for reassessment. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s plea for remand, stressing the need for consistency in income treatment unless warranted by significant changes. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the historical treatment of income from properties as &#039;income from house property&#039; in most instances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 570 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346512</link>
      <description>The Court allowed exemptions for delay in filing applications in ITA No. 504/2017. The Revenue&#039;s appeal against ITAT&#039;s order for AY 2007-08 in ITA No.733 and 788/Del/2013 was addressed. The dispute centered on classifying income from properties as business income or income from house property. The Assessee historically treated the income as &#039;income from house property,&#039; but the AO changed the classification. The ITAT upheld the historical treatment for two properties and remanded the third for reassessment. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s plea for remand, stressing the need for consistency in income treatment unless warranted by significant changes. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the historical treatment of income from properties as &#039;income from house property&#039; in most instances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>