https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346493 The Tribunal held that the activities of the appellant, involving the display of advertisements through various mediums, did not qualify as services falling under Advertisement Agency Service. The demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed by the original authority was deemed unsustainable due to the lack of clarity in the law surrounding the taxability of the appellant's activities. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant could not be held guilty of suppression of facts justifying the demand invoking an extended period of limitation. Consequently, the appeal was allowed on the ground of limitation, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346493 The Tribunal held that the activities of the appellant, involving the display of advertisements through various mediums, did not qualify as services falling under Advertisement Agency Service. The demand of service tax, interest, and penalties imposed by the original authority was deemed unsustainable due to the lack of clarity in the law surrounding the taxability of the appellant's activities. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant could not be held guilty of suppression of facts justifying the demand invoking an extended period of limitation. Consequently, the appeal was allowed on the ground of limitation, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346493