<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 550 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand for non-payment of service tax under the Advertising Agency Service category, confirming that the appellant&#039;s activities did not align with the definition of an advertising agency. The Tribunal also ruled that the demand based on the extended limitation period was unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 550 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the tax demand for non-payment of service tax under the Advertising Agency Service category, confirming that the appellant&#039;s activities did not align with the definition of an advertising agency. The Tribunal also ruled that the demand based on the extended limitation period was unsustainable, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>