<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346487</link>
    <description>Where an assessee reverses credit, pays duty and interest, and intimates the department under Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, the dispute is treated as concluded and no show-cause notice is required. A later refund claim cannot be used to reopen the merits of that settled position. The refund was therefore held not maintainable, and the assessee was not permitted to contest the underlying liability after invoking the voluntary-payment mechanism under Section 11A(2B).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346487</link>
      <description>Where an assessee reverses credit, pays duty and interest, and intimates the department under Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, the dispute is treated as concluded and no show-cause notice is required. A later refund claim cannot be used to reopen the merits of that settled position. The refund was therefore held not maintainable, and the assessee was not permitted to contest the underlying liability after invoking the voluntary-payment mechanism under Section 11A(2B).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>