<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346487</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original authority&#039;s decision to reject the appellant&#039;s refund claim, as the appellant had opted for immunity under Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, settling the duty and interest dispute. The Tribunal ruled that once the appellant chose immunity and filed a declaration, they could not seek a refund, and the department was barred from issuing further show-cause notices. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the refund claim was not maintainable post opting for immunity under Section 11A(2B).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 545 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346487</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original authority&#039;s decision to reject the appellant&#039;s refund claim, as the appellant had opted for immunity under Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, settling the duty and interest dispute. The Tribunal ruled that once the appellant chose immunity and filed a declaration, they could not seek a refund, and the department was barred from issuing further show-cause notices. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the refund claim was not maintainable post opting for immunity under Section 11A(2B).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>